Obstructing Tax Administration lawyer Anne Arundel County, MD

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

Obstructing Tax Administration lawyer Anne Arundel County, MD



Obstructing Tax Administration lawyer Anne Arundel County, MD

Facing a federal charge for obstructing tax administration in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, is a serious matter with potentially severe consequences. The Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division (IRS-CI) thoroughly investigates cases involving interference with the lawful administration of the Internal Revenue Code, and when the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland elects to prosecute, the matter proceeds in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel team at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. provide defense representation to individuals in Anne Arundel County and throughout Maryland who are under investigation or have been charged with obstructing tax administration under 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a). Reach the firm at (888) 437-7747 to request a consultation. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York | Founded 1997 | English, Spanish, Tamil | By appointment only — call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

Anne Arundel County residents who are the subject of a federal criminal tax investigation or indictment will typically see their case handled in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. That court operates two main divisions: the Baltimore Division at 101 West Lombard Street and the Greenbelt Division at 6500 Cherrywood Lane. Cases arising out of Anne Arundel County communities — Annapolis, Glen Burnie, Severna Park, Crofton, Odenton, Pasadena, Arnold, Gambrills, and Millersville — are generally assigned to one of these divisions based on judicial schedules and the location of the alleged conduct. Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel appear in the District of Maryland to represent clients charged with obstructing tax administration and other federal tax crimes.

What Is Obstructing Tax Administration?

Obstructing or impeding the due administration of the Internal Revenue Code is a federal felony under 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a). The statute applies broadly to conduct that interferes with the work of the IRS in assessing and collecting taxes, auditing returns, or enforcing the tax laws. Unlike tax evasion under § 7201, which requires proof of a tax deficiency, an obstruction charge may be brought based on acts that corruptly impede an IRS officer or employee performing official duties. Common examples include providing false information to an IRS agent, destroying records, attempting to influence an auditor through threats or deception, or submitting fabricated documents during an examination.

The IRS Criminal Investigation Division works with federal prosecutors to build these cases, often using forensic accounting analysis, witness interviews, and documentary evidence. A conviction does not require the government to prove that any tax was actually evaded; the focus is on the obstructive conduct itself. Because the statute is broadly worded, a person may face this charge even if the underlying tax liability is small or nonexistent.

Penalties and Consequences of Obstructing Tax Administration in Federal Court

A violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a) carries serious penalties determined by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and applicable statutory maximums. The sentencing range depends on factors such as the offense level, criminal history category, the amount of tax loss, and whether the conduct involved sophisticated means or obstruction of justice. A court may impose a term of imprisonment, a period of supervised release, a substantial fine, and an order of restitution. Federal law does not provide for parole; an individual sentenced to prison must serve the majority of the term imposed. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland, through its Baltimore and Greenbelt divisions, prosecutes these matters vigorously.

Beyond incarceration, a federal felony conviction can create lasting collateral disadvantages, including restrictions on professional licenses, security clearances, and employment opportunities. For non‑U.S. Citizens, a felony tax conviction may have immigration consequences. The firm works to develop defense strategies that address both the immediate charges and the long‑term repercussions of a conviction.

Federal Court Procedure in Maryland for Tax Offenses

A federal criminal tax case generally begins with an investigation by the IRS‑CI. If the investigation yields probable cause, the matter is presented to a federal grand jury sitting in the District of Maryland. An indictment is the formal charging document. After indictment, the defendant appears for arraignment before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, enters a plea, and the court determines conditions for pretrial release. The case then proceeds through discovery, pretrial motions, plea negotiations, and, if no resolution is reached, a jury trial before a U.S. District Judge.

Discovery in a tax obstruction case often involves voluminous financial records, IRS agent reports, and forensic analysis. The defense may challenge the admissibility of evidence, the scope of the investigation, or the government’s interpretation of the defendant’s conduct. Early intervention, before an indictment is returned, can sometimes shape the course of the investigation and influence the charging decision. Because the federal procedural timeline is driven by the Speedy Trial Act and the court’s scheduling orders, the pace of the case varies according to its complexity and the number of pretrial motions filed.

How Mr. Sris and His Of Counsel Handle Federal Tax Crime Cases

Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel bring extensive combined legal experience to the defense of federal tax crime cases. The approach is tailored to the specific facts of each investigation or indictment. The team examines the government’s evidence for weaknesses, evaluates whether the alleged conduct actually constitutes obstruction under § 7212(a), and assesses the strength of any affirmative defenses. When appropriate, the team engages in proactive dialogue with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to seek declination of prosecution, a reduction of charges, or a favorable pretrial resolution. If trial is necessary, Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel prepare thoroughly to challenge the government’s case, cross‑examine its agents and witnesses, and present a compelling defense.

The firm has served clients in federal courts throughout Maryland since its founding in 1997. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). Although every matter is unique, the firm’s collective experience in federal criminal defense informs the strategy at every stage.

About Mr. Sris and His Of Counsel Team

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor. He is admitted to practice law in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. Since founding the firm in 1997, he has concentrated in federal criminal defense and represents clients in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. His Of Counsel team draws on extensive combined legal experience. The team includes attorneys with backgrounds in criminal litigation and former government service, providing a broad foundation for handling complex federal tax crime cases. Results may vary.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does obstructing tax administration mean under federal law?

Obstructing tax administration under 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a) means corruptly impeding the lawful efforts of an IRS officer or employee to administer the Internal Revenue Code. The conduct can include lying to an IRS agent, providing fraudulent documents during an audit, destroying records, or otherwise interfering with an investigation or assessment. The statute does not require proof that any additional tax was owed; the focus is on the obstructive act itself. A person may face this charge even if the underlying tax return was accurate. An experienced federal criminal defense attorney can explain how the statute may apply to a specific situation.

How do federal sentencing guidelines apply to tax obstruction cases in Maryland?

Federal sentencing for tax obstruction follows the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which calculate a sentencing range based on the offense level and the defendant’s criminal history category. The offense level is influenced by the tax loss amount, whether the conduct involved sophisticated means, and whether an adjustment applies for acceptance of responsibility or obstruction of justice. While the guidelines are advisory since United States v. Booker, they significantly influence the sentence a judge imposes. The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland routinely applies these guidelines. An attorney can explain how specific guideline provisions may affect a case.

What should I do if I am contacted by an IRS Criminal Investigation agent in Anne Arundel County?

If an IRS‑CI agent contacts you, you should politely decline to answer questions and state that you wish to speak with an attorney. You are not required to speak with law enforcement, and anything you say can be used against you in a criminal proceeding. Do not provide documents or access to records without first consulting counsel. Early involvement of a lawyer can protect your rights and help you understand the scope of the investigation. Call a federal criminal defense attorney as soon as possible, before any interview takes place.

Can an obstructing tax administration charge be brought without an underlying tax evasion charge?

Yes, the government can charge a violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a) even if it never alleges that the defendant evaded or underpaid any tax. The statute prohibits corruptly impeding the administration of the IRC, which is a separate offense from tax evasion under § 7201. For example, making false statements to an auditor or concealing records during an examination can support an obstruction charge regardless of whether the taxpayer’s return was accurate. The government must prove the obstructive act was done corruptly; a lawyer can challenge whether the evidence meets that standard.

How does a federal criminal tax case differ from a state criminal tax case in Maryland?

Federal tax crimes are prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in U.S. District Court under the Internal Revenue Code, while Maryland state tax crimes are prosecuted by the appropriate State’s Attorney in Maryland Circuit Court under the Tax‑General Article. Federal cases involve federal investigative agencies like IRS‑CI, federal sentencing guidelines, and no possibility of parole. The procedural rules, evidentiary standards, and sentencing frameworks are distinct. An attorney experienced in federal criminal defense is essential because state-court experience does not automatically translate to the federal system.

How long does a federal obstructing tax administration case take in the District of Maryland?

The timeline for a federal tax obstruction case in the District of Maryland varies, but the Speedy Trial Act requires that trial begin within a certain time after indictment, subject to delays for pretrial motions or continuances. Complex cases involving extensive financial records may take longer to resolve than simpler matters. The judge’s scheduling orders, the number of defendants, and the volume of discovery all affect the pace. A defense attorney can provide an estimate based on the specific circumstances of a case after reviewing the indictment and discovery.

What are the potential defenses to an obstructing tax administration charge?

Defenses may include lack of corrupt intent, insufficient evidence of obstruction, lawful conduct, or constitutional challenges to the government’s investigation. Because the statute requires that the interference be “corrupt,” a person who acted negligently or inadvertently may not meet the statutory standard. An attorney may also challenge the admissibility of evidence obtained through an improper search or interview. Each case is fact‑specific, and a thorough review of the government’s evidence is necessary to identify viable defenses.

Do I need a lawyer for an obstructing tax administration charge in Anne Arundel County?

Yes, you should obtain legal representation immediately if you are under investigation or have been charged with obstructing tax administration. A federal felony charge carries the potential for incarceration, significant fines, and lasting collateral consequences. An experienced federal criminal defense attorney can protect your rights during the investigation, negotiate with prosecutors, and, if necessary, present a defense at trial. Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel team at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. handle these matters for clients in Anne Arundel County and throughout Maryland. Call (888) 437-7747.

How does the IRS investigate tax obstruction cases?

IRS Criminal Investigation uses specialized agents who are trained to analyze financial records, interview witnesses, and execute search warrants in tax crime cases. The investigation may include forensic accounting, undercover operations, and joint task forces with the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Drug Enforcement Administration in cases involving parallel criminal activity. Agents may seek documents through administrative summons or grand jury subpoenas before an indictment is returned. Understanding the agency’s investigative methods is an important part of building a defense.

What is the difference between obstructing tax administration and making false statements to a federal agent?

While both offenses involve dishonesty toward the government, 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a) specifically targets interference with the administration of the Internal Revenue Code, whereas 18 U.S.C. § 1001 prohibits making a materially false statement in any matter within the jurisdiction of the federal government. A person could be charged under both statutes if the false statement was made to an IRS agent. The elements of proof differ: § 7212(a) requires a corrupt act that obstructs the IRS, while § 1001 requires a false statement that is material to a government proceeding or investigation. The potential penalties and guideline calculations may also differ.

Last reviewed: July 2026

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.

All practice pages

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.