Felon in Possession lawyer Baltimore, MD

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

Felon in Possession lawyer Baltimore, MD





Felon in Possession lawyer Baltimore, MD

Federal felon‑in‑possession charges in Baltimore are prosecuted actively by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland, with the full weight of federal investigative resources behind each case. If you are facing an indictment under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, you need counsel who understands federal procedure from the grand‑jury stage through sentencing. The Baltimore Division of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, located at 101 West Lombard Street, handles these matters, and the potential penalties include a prison term of up to ten years—or substantially more if the Armed Career Criminal Act or other enhancements apply. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. has represented clients in federal courtrooms across Maryland since 1997. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys focus on building a thorough defense strategy that addresses every phase of a federal prosecution. To request a consultation, call (888) 437‑7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

What Felon in Possession Means in Baltimore, MD

Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), it is a federal crime for any person who has been convicted of a crime punishable by more than one year in prison to possess a firearm or ammunition. The charge does not require that the firearm be used in a new offense—mere possession, even in a home or vehicle, can support an indictment. Federal authorities in Baltimore, including the FBI, ATF, and Baltimore City Police task‑force officers, routinely bring these cases after traffic stops, search warrants, or investigations into other alleged criminal activity. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland decides whether to seek an indictment, and the case is then litigated at the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland’s Baltimore Division.

Because federal felon‑in‑possession prosecutions carry severe consequences, early engagement with counsel is critical. After arrest, a defendant appears before a U.S. Magistrate judge for an initial appearance and a detention hearing. The government often argues for pretrial detention on the ground that the accused poses a danger to the community or a risk of flight. An experienced federal defense team can challenge the government’s detention request and work to secure release on appropriate conditions. If the case proceeds, the prosecution must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys scrutinize how the firearm was discovered, whether the search complied with the Fourth Amendment, and whether the government can prove the defendant’s prior felony conviction—an element the Supreme Court has clarified must be proven to the jury. Sentencing under the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines often turns on the defendant’s criminal history, the type of firearm involved, and whether any sentencing enhancements apply. The firm’s approach is to present a vigorous defense at each procedural stage.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Felon in Possession Cases

From the first contact, the defense team at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. begins a detailed review of the government’s evidence. Federal felon‑in‑possession cases often hinge on the legality of a search or seizure, the reliability of witness identifications, or forensic evidence linking the defendant to the firearm. The firm’s attorneys file appropriate pretrial motions—motions to suppress evidence obtained in violation of constitutional protections, motions to compel discovery of exculpatory material, and motions to dismiss if the indictment is legally insufficient. No two cases are alike, and the defense strategy is tailored to the specific facts of the matter.

When a case goes to trial, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive courtroom experience to the jury. The government must prove that the defendant knowingly possessed a firearm and had the requisite prior felony conviction. The firm challenges the prosecution’s evidence through cross‑examination, presentation of defense witnesses, and, when appropriate, expert testimony on forensic or ballistic issues. If conviction is entered, the sentencing phase becomes the next critical battleground. The defense prepares a comprehensive sentencing memorandum that highlights mitigating circumstances, challenges Guidelines enhancements, and argues for a sentence below the advisory range when supported by the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Throughout the process, the goal is to protect the client’s rights and seek the favorable outcomes under the law.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., has been practicing federal criminal defense since 1997. A former prosecutor, he brings insight into how the government builds its cases and where those cases are often most vulnerable. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). He is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and regularly appears in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division.

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys include former Maryland prosecutors and lawyers with decades of litigation experience. Their collective background encompasses every stage of federal criminal proceedings—from initial appearance and detention hearing through trial and appeal. Relying on that extensive experience, the firm’s attorneys have handled a wide range of federal matters in Maryland. Results may vary.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need a federal criminal defense lawyer for a felon‑in‑possession charge in Baltimore?

Yes, you need an attorney who practices regularly in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland because federal felon‑in‑possession prosecutions involve distinct procedural rules, mandatory sentencing considerations, and a high‑stakes pretrial detention environment. Federal practice differs significantly from state court, and an attorney experienced with the U.S. Attorney’s approach in Baltimore can evaluate the strength of the government’s case, identify constitutional issues, and develop a defense strategy before indictment. To discuss your situation, reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747.

What are the penalties for felon in possession under federal law?

Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2), a conviction for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon carries a maximum sentence of ten years in prison, but the Armed Career Criminal Act (18 U.S.C. § 924(e)) imposes a mandatory minimum of fifteen years if the defendant has three prior convictions for a violent felony or serious drug offense. Beyond incarceration, a sentence can include a term of supervised release, fines, and forfeiture of the firearm and ammunition. The actual sentence depends on the defendant’s criminal history, the specific conduct, and the application of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Because these factors are case‑specific, consultation with a defense attorney is essential.

How does the federal court process work in Baltimore for a felon‑in‑possession case?

A federal felon‑in‑possession case in Baltimore typically begins with an arrest or a summons, followed by an initial appearance and a detention hearing before a U.S. Magistrate judge at the Baltimore federal courthouse. If the court orders detention, the defendant remains in federal custody while the case proceeds. The prosecution may seek a grand‑jury indictment, which formally charges the offense. After arraignment, the defense and prosecution exchange discovery, file pretrial motions, and engage in plea negotiations. If no plea is entered, the case goes to trial. Sentencing occurs after a conviction, and an appeal may follow. Timelines vary based on the complexity of the case and the court’s calendar.

Can a felon‑in‑possession charge be dropped or dismissed?

Yes, a felon‑in‑possession charge can be dismissed if the defense successfully challenges the legality of the search that led to the firearm’s discovery, demonstrates the government cannot prove knowing possession, or shows that the defendant’s prior conviction does not satisfy the statutory definition of a qualifying felony. Motions to suppress evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment are among the most powerful tools in a federal defense. Additionally, if the prosecution fails to turn over exculpatory evidence or if the indictment is legally deficient, dismissal may be warranted. Each case turns on its unique facts, and an early investigation by defense counsel is crucial.

What should I do if I am facing felon‑in‑possession charges in Baltimore?

Contact a qualified federal criminal defense attorney immediately, exercise your right to remain silent, and do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone other than your lawyer. Federal agents and prosecutors may seek to interview you; anything you say can be used against you. Preserve any documentation, receipts, or electronic evidence that may be relevant to the defense. The earlier defense counsel can intervene, the more options are available—including the possibility of negotiating a voluntary surrender, seeking pretrial release, and preserving critical evidence. For guidance on your specific situation, contact Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747.

Related pages: Montgomery County Federal Criminal Lawyer | Prince George’s County Federal Criminal Lawyer | Howard County Federal Criminal Lawyer | Anne Arundel County Federal Criminal Lawyer | Frederick County Federal Criminal Lawyer

Primary sources: U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland — official court website | U.S. Attorney’s Office — District of Maryland — prosecuting federal cases in Baltimore | United States Sentencing Commission — federal sentencing guidelines and resources

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results may vary.

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.


All practice pages

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.