Subornation of Perjury lawyer Anne Arundel County, MD

Federal subornation of perjury is a serious offense prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1622. The statute makes it a crime to procure or induce another person to commit perjury—that is, to knowingly cause someone to make a materially false statement under oath in a federal proceeding. In Anne Arundel County, Maryland, these charges are pursued by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland and typically tried in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, with courthouses in Baltimore and Greenbelt. A conviction can lead to a prison term of up to five years, substantial fines, and the stigma of a federal felony record. Because the federal system has no parole and follows advisory sentencing guidelines that heavily influence the actual sentence imposed, the stakes are exceptionally high for anyone facing such allegations. Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel team at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. have extensive experience in federal criminal defense, including offenses against the administration of justice. They understand the active investigative tactics used by federal agents—often involving the FBI, IRS‑CI, or other federal agencies—and the procedural complexity of grand‑jury indictments and pretrial motion practice in the District of Maryland. If you are under investigation or have been charged with subornation of perjury in Anne Arundel County, early engagement with defense counsel is critical. Contact Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747 to request a confidential consultation.
Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

On This Page

What Federal Subornation of Perjury Means in Anne Arundel County

Anne Arundel County, home to the state capital of Annapolis and situated along the major I‑97 and Route 50 corridors, falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Federal criminal cases originating in the county are assigned to either the Baltimore or Greenbelt courthouses, depending on the nature of the charge, docket congestion, and other administrative factors. The federal court is a forum unlike any state or local courtroom: procedures are governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the rules of evidence are strictly applied, and the judges are appointed for life. The U.S. Attorney’s Office brings a level of prosecutorial resources—including access to federal grand juries, extensive investigative agency support, and experienced Assistant U.S. Attorneys—that demands a defense team thoroughly versed in federal practice.

A charge of subornation of perjury strikes at the heart of the judicial system’s integrity. Federal prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant procured or induced another person to swear to a materially false statement while under oath in a federal court, deposition, or other official proceeding, and that the defendant acted with knowledge that the statement was false. Materiality is judged by whether the false statement could have influenced the proceeding. Defending such a charge often requires a granular examination of the alleged statement, the context in which it was made, the credibility of the witness who was supposedly induced, and any motivations or misunderstandings that may undermine the prosecution’s narrative. In Anne Arundel County, cases can involve a wide range of underlying proceedings—from civil depositions to administrative hearings to criminal trials—and each scenario presents its own strategic challenges. Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel assess every element of the government’s case, often working with private investigators and forensic experts to challenge the factual foundation of the perjury allegation and the alleged procurement.

Subornation of perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1622 carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment and a fine as determined by the court.

Source: 18 U.S.C. § 1622. 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, admitted in VA/MD/DC/NJ/NY.

How Mr. Sris and His Of Counsel Handle Federal Subornation Cases

Because a federal indictment for subornation of perjury typically follows a lengthy grand‑jury investigation, the defense team at Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. Often begins work before charges are filed. Mr. Sris, a former prosecutor, and his Of Counsel attorneys—several of whom have extensive federal court experience—conduct a detailed analysis of the government’s theory of the case. This includes reviewing all available transcripts, exhibits, and witness statements; identifying inconsistencies or improper pressures that may have been applied to the alleged perjurer; and examining whether the defendant even had the requisite intent to “procure” a false statement. When early engagement occurs, the team can advocate directly with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to present mitigating facts or to challenge the legal sufficiency of the evidence before an indictment is returned.

If the case proceeds to indictment, the attorneys file appropriate pretrial motions—often challenging the materiality of the alleged perjury, the admissibility of co‑conspirator statements, or the government’s use of immunized testimony. They also evaluate potential defenses such as recantation (where the law permits it), lack of corrupt intent, or the absence of a valid oath. Throughout the process, Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel maintain close communication with the client, explaining each procedural step, the potential sentencing exposure under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, and the realistic risks and benefits of proceeding to trial versus negotiating a resolution. Every strategic decision is made collaboratively, grounded in a realistic appraisal of the government’s evidence and the client’s individual circumstances.

About Mr. Sris and His Of Counsel Team

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., has practiced federal criminal defense since the firm’s founding in 1997. He is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and brings the perspective of a former prosecutor to every federal matter. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova), reflecting a thorough understanding of statutory interpretation and reform. His Of Counsel team includes attorneys with backgrounds in federal litigation, former state prosecution, and complex motion practice. Together, Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel bring extensive combined legal experience to the defense of individuals accused of federal crimes in Anne Arundel County and throughout the District of Maryland. Results may vary. past outcomes do not guarantee a similar result.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between perjury and subornation of perjury?

Perjury is making a materially false statement under oath oneself; subornation of perjury is procuring or inducing another person to commit perjury. While perjury punishes the person who lies under oath, subornation targets the individual who pressured, bribed, or otherwise caused that person to lie. Federal law treats both as felonies, but subornation requires proof that the defendant knew the statement was false and specifically intended to bring about the perjured testimony. The evidence often comes from communications, financial records, or witness testimony about the defendant’s instructions or suggestions. Conviction does not require that the underlying perjury actually occurred—only that the defendant attempted to cause it.

Do I need a lawyer if I am being investigated for subornation of perjury in Anne Arundel County?

Yes, you need experienced federal defense counsel immediately if you learn you are the subject of a subornation of perjury investigation. Federal agents will often attempt to interview you before seeking an indictment, and anything you say can be used against you. Having a lawyer present during any contact with investigators protects your rights and allows you to understand whether the government has a viable case. Early legal representation may also allow your attorney to present exculpatory evidence or legal arguments to the U.S. Attorney’s Office before charges are filed, potentially avoiding indictment. For guidance on your specific situation, reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747.

How does a federal criminal case proceed in the District of Maryland?

Federal cases typically begin with an investigation by an agency such as the FBI or IRS‑CI, followed by a grand‑jury indictment. After indictment, the defendant appears for an initial appearance and arraignment before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pretrial motions are litigated, discovery is exchanged, and the case may proceed to a scheduled plea hearing or trial. Trials are held before a U.S. District Judge, and sentencing—if convicted—follows the advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The timeline varies based on the complexity of the case and the court’s calendar.

What are the potential penalties for federal subornation of perjury?

A conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1622 carries a maximum prison term of five years, a fine, and a term of supervised release. The actual sentence is determined by the court after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which calculate a range based on the offense level and the defendant’s criminal history. Additional consequences can include loss of professional licenses, damage to reputation, and restrictions on federal benefits. Because there is no parole in the federal system, a defendant must serve at least 85% of any prison sentence imposed.

What defenses are available against a subornation of perjury charge?

Common defenses include challenging the materiality of the alleged false statement, disputing the defendant’s intent to procure perjury, and demonstrating that no valid oath was administered. The prosecution must prove that the defendant knew the statement was false and specifically intended to cause the perjury. If the underlying statement was not material to the proceeding, or if the defendant believed it to be true, a conviction cannot stand. A thorough defense often involves scrutinizing the relationship between the defendant and the alleged perjurer, examining any audio or written communications, and testing the credibility of government witnesses. Each defense is fact‑specific, and Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel tailor strategies to the unique circumstances of every case.

Outbound Primary Sources:
18 U.S.C. § 1622 (Subornation of perjury) |
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland |
U.S. Attorney’s Office – District of Maryland

Last reviewed: July 2026

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.